| Environmental information | |
|
|
Environmental information falls under the Environmental Information Regulations (EIRs), rather than the FOIA. The Regulations does not specify exactly what information is classed as environmental, but among the types covered are:
The Regulations cover the same range of public authorities as the FOIA and enforcement procedures are also the same, with public authorities expected to abide by the Code of Practice issued under the FOIA’s section 45. They are also required to proactively release environmental information under their publication schemes. There is no geographical restriction on the information, as long as it is held by one of the public authorities covered by the EIRs, it can relate to anywhere in the world. It may therefore include information about UK embassies and foreign aid programmes. Neither are there any historical restrictions, since, like the FOIA, the regulations are fully retrospective. Unlike the FOIA, information requests may be made orally, as well as in writing. Exemptions The EIRs' exemptions are narrower than the FOIA; there are fewer of them, and, crucially they are all qualified - or ‘public interest’ – exemptions, rather than absolute. The ‘harm test’ applied in some of these qualified exemptions is also more stringent. Information can only be withheld if it would ‘adversely affect’ the subjects specified, rather than simply ‘prejudice’ them (‘prejudice’ being the term used in the FOIA). Taken together these factors mean that, in theory, it is easier to access information than under the FOIA. However, as the freedom of information campaigners have pointed out, some documents will be covered by both the EIRs and the FOIA, which could undermine the EIRs’ more liberal regime. The ‘adversely affect’ test applies to information involving:
The other main balanced exemptions concern:
|
|
content © freedomofinformation.co.uk : powered by mambo : built by latitude